Skip to main content

  • HOME
  • CURRENT CONTENT
  • ALL CONTENT
  • SUBMIT
  • ABOUT
    • Journal
    • Editorial
  • INFO FOR
    • Librarians
    • Authors
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Subscriptions and Single Issues
  • MORE
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us

  • Login

  • Advanced search

  • Login
Advanced Search
  • HOME
  • CURRENT CONTENT
  • ALL CONTENT
  • SUBMIT
  • ABOUT
    • Journal
    • Editorial
  • INFO FOR
    • Librarians
    • Authors
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Subscriptions and Single Issues
  • MORE
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians

The Domus Aurea Reconsidered
P. Gregory Warden
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 40 No. 4, Dec., 1981; (pp. 271-278) DOI: 10.2307/989644
P. Gregory Warden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
PreviousNext
Loading

Abstract

The Domus Aurea was built by Nero after the fire of 64 A. D., and construction continued at least until Nero's death in 68. Although the building is described by Roman writers, none of the remains identified today as the Domus Aurea are mentioned in the literary sources. Previous scholarship, basing itself on literary sources and other Roman monuments, has shown that the Domus Aurea was a landscape park in which the architectural components were subordinated to a greater landscape design, but problems still remain with regard to topographical questions. The Domus Aurea is normally reconstructed as vast in scale, covering up to 80 hectares or a large part of ancient Rome. It is suggested here that the monument covered a much smaller area, perhaps only half that normally reconstructed. Problems of chronology are also discussed, particularly the question of what happened to the building after the death of Nero. It is suggested that the Esquiline wing, the best known of the buildings presently identified as the Domus Aurea, is only partially Neronian, and that its eastern section is Flavian in date. This revision affects our view of the development of Roman architecture and assigns less importance to the role played by Neronian architects in the "concrete revolution" of the 1st century A. D.

  • Copyright 1981 The Society of Architectural Historians

SAH Member Access

Instead of logging in here, SAH Members obtain access by first logging in to the SAH website, then visiting the JSAH Online page and clicking the link to return to this site with access.

Log in using your username and password

Enter your Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol. 40 No. 4, Dec., 1981

Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians: 40 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
eTOC Alert

RSSRSS Icon

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Domus Aurea Reconsidered
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians web site.
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The Domus Aurea Reconsidered
P. Gregory Warden
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 40 No. 4, Dec., 1981; (pp. 271-278) DOI: 10.2307/989644
P. Gregory Warden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Domus Aurea Reconsidered
P. Gregory Warden
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 40 No. 4, Dec., 1981; (pp. 271-278) DOI: 10.2307/989644
P. Gregory Warden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site
Permalink: Copy
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
View Full Page PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Web of Science (4)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

FIND US Facebook Account LinkRSS Feeds LinkTwitter Account LinkInstagram Account LinkLinkedin Account LinkYoutube Account LinkEmail Link

Customer Service

  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Contact

UC Press

  • About UC Press

Navigate

  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • Editorial
  • Contact

Content

  • Current Issue
  • All Content

Info For

  • Librarians
  • Authors
  • Advertisers
  • Subscriptions and Single Issues

Copyright © 2016 by the Society of Architectural Historians   Privacy   Accessibility